Part 1091a(a)(1) claims “[i]t ‘s the intent behind so it subsection to ensure financial obligation to repay money and you will give overpayments are implemented rather than reference to people Federal or State statutory, regulating, otherwise management maximum into several months within and this debts is implemented

Correctly, we find you to petitioner provides don’t show that PHEAA made any false sign regarding profile, the amount, otherwise quantity of their financing as blocked by-west Virginia Password § 46A-2-127(d). Because this Judge makes clear several times, “the fresh new cluster opposing realization wisdom need match the weight off proof through providing more only ‘scintilla of research.’ ” Williams v. Reliability Coil, Inc., 194 W. Virtual assistant. 52, sixty, 459 S. Versatility Reception, Inc., 477 You. S. 242, 252 (1986)). Subsequent, “a bona-fide topic cannot develop until there was adequate proof favoring this new low-swinging people getting a reasonable jury to return a verdict having you to definitely cluster.” Syl. Pt. 5, simply, Jividen v. Laws, 194 W. Va. 705, 708, 461 S.Elizabeth.2d 451, 454 (1995). To make an excellent trialworthy issue, “brand new non-moving group [must] point out a minumum of one debated ‘material’ issues. A content simple truth is the one that is able to sway the results of one’s lawsuits in applicable rules.” Id. 19

1. Into , the fresh new circuit courtroom lso are-inserted the transaction granting bottom line judgment to own reason for appellate opinion inasmuch because routine clerk didn’t offer duplicates so you can guidance out of checklist. Read more “Age.2d 329, 337 (1995) (quoting Anderson v”